photography

What I learned photographing #12: PortconMaine 2021

What I learned photographing PortconMaine 2021

I’ve had a long gestating idea to go document anime conventions and the folks that go to them. I’m not strictly speaking about the cosplayers, either -- ideally I’d document everyone that went, regardless of costume or status, etc. I feel that the community as a whole is large, diverse, and has never really been seriously documented - though the cosplay has by Elena Dorfman (Aperture) As a teenager, I used to be a hardcore weeb -- I’ve subsequently fallen out/aged into different interests -- but I’ll never not have a fondness for anime and the people that watch it; which is what inspired me to revisit the subject as an adult, fifteen years later.

Unfortunately (but sensibly enough), most or all cons were cancelled in 2020, for reasons that should be immediately honest to everyone. So I was stuck waiting for 2021. I actually first attended Portcon back in 2007 as a surly teen -- and I was curious to see “what had changed?” and honestly, cutting just a bit to the end, the general answer is: not that much.

The first re-exposure I had to anime conventions as an adult was actually back in Los Angeles - I lived downtown, and during Anime Expo I’d often find a lot of spillover out from the staples center into the rest of downtown, often flooding my favorite neighborhood places. That said, Anime Expo always seemed larger than life, wild, packed, and like too much; by contrast, one con-goer and vendor described Portcon as: “The most boring con you’ve ever been to, but in a good way.” 

If you’re here from Portcon, and see yourself in one of the photos, don’t hesitate to reach out! I’d be happy to send you a copy, or a print, or something, and remove/give you full credit as need be.

So here’s what I learned photographing Portcon and it’s con-goers -- I’ll break down what I learned into three sections: Technical, Artistic, Social. — Skip to the bottom of the page if you want to see my favorite images from the weekend.

TECHNICAL:

I shot exclusively 35mm Ilford HP5+ @ 400 iso, then pushed to 1600 in Kodak Xtol 1:1 - I learned next to nothing here, this is about as reliable/firmament of film/recipe as it comes. Give film enough light, and push it for contrast, you’re more or less in the clear - especially if you’re scanning. I only ended up with eight rolls over the three days, so I was able to develop all eight rolls in one go in my paterson tank.

In the last year, I picked up a Minolta CLE - an entire kit (ie the Minolta CLE body, the Rokkor-M 28mm 2.8 [of course with schneideritis], Rokkor-M 40mm 2.0, Rokkor-M 90mm 4.0; minus a working on camera flash.) Following in a long, long tradition of documentary photogs using M-Mount rangefinders, I elected to use the CLE, along with an off camera flash, actually built for that specific era of Minolta 35mm Cameras, so there’d be minimal cause for error - minimal being the key word here. I’m not hyper familiar with the CLE like I am with my Minolta XD-11, or even my Pentax 6x7 - but overall, it wasn’t too clunky to use in practice, day in day out. My particular 40mm lens seems to want to focus beyond infinity, which is strange, but again, it works out most of the time.

My biggest issue technically was getting the flash to sync well with the camera - the flash I used has a long recycle time, and I’m not super experienced using a flash - so my results vary a lot - on the final day my connector cable seemed to shit the bed, at which point I just called it for the weekend -- Ideally, the wisdom is to test your equipment heavily before going out to a shoot date, but while I was in the “research and development” phase of the project, I deemed it OK for a bit of jank or fiddliness.

The other issue I ran into was that one of my rolls snapped in half mid-shoot. I bought my rolls (which were all bulk loaded) off of an acquaintance who shall remain nameless, because I thought I was going to be shooting a ton more than I ended up shooting and wanted to get all the film in one sweep - I’ve had two or three of them snap since that day, and it’s pretty frustrating. I dislike bulk rolls because they always seem to have issues -- even if they’re not using the method of taping the ends of rolls onto recycled canisters/leaders. 

TL;DR: I dunno, don’t bulk load film - there’s no real savings (the new canisters go bad after two loads, so they’re not cheap -- and especially don’t do the recycled canister method - even if the canisters are free.)

My final note is that my scanner (an epson v600, natch) is just fucked. I got a particularly bad copy of the epson v600 when I moved back to Maine, and I still can’t get 35mm right, like I did on the old v600 I had when I lived in LA.

I think my key takeaways for gear are: I shot the first 2 days on the 40mm - to middling success - there are some good photos taken with it, but I think for me - the key turn is when I swapped to the 90mm on the final day of the show -- the closer cropped portraits are much more what I had in mind back before I even started shooting. flash is hard, especially when you’re starting at zero - the cables can get clogged/or not work quite right - close cropped portraits work much better. I need to do something about my scanner, be it find a way to shim the focus, or buy/rent a better-newer model scanner. 

Also, I don’t know if rangefinders, or 35mm is really “for me” anymore in my main project work. For my big project that I’m working on off-screen, I now only shoot original Fuji Acros 100 in medium format, and I’m generally much happier with the results than I am when I shoot 35mm. I also would consider swapping to something with a bellows (like a Mamiya c-330, or even RZ67) or close focus to shoot the portraits on so that I could get a closer crop.

ARTISTIC:

Portraiture is hard. Especially portraiture where you’re attempting to portray people honestly, and make them the star of the photo, with little accompaniment or background to balance the subject with.

Add on to that I’m somewhat disinclined to work with people on the whole -- or it’s a foreign concept to me (mostly). My interest sort of clicked into place when I started making just headshots or face photos with the Minolta M-Rokkor 90mm F/4.0 over the Minolta CLE Rokkor-M 40mm f/2.0, as an almost topographic approach to faces, rather than a purely documentary look at cosplayers.

Mark Steinmetz topographies with Diane Arbus rendering was kind of my starting idea for a look, and I’d say I got intermittent success - but at the same time none of the photos really add up to be “more” than maybe a few fun portraits, and a neat sort of catalog of cosplayers - again, not their fault the photos didn’t meet my expectations - the cosplayers and attendees were nothing if not game and helpful, I’m just wildly terrible at getting folks to perform street portraiture or whatever this constitutes.

To my eye the best portraits tended to either be: 

Favorite posed non-crop

Favorite posed non-crop

One: The photos where folks really went in on posing for them - check to your left.

Or Two: the super zoomed in photos -- Check right, below

With honorable mention (or perhaps the stealthy “best” category) going to the few photos where I managed to get approval, then shoot a quasi candid photo -- I think there’s money on the table on this one, and I hope to explore it more.

(personal favorite closeup)

(personal favorite closeup)

Black and White is definitely the right choice over color - I’m not aiming to document the costumes - again, a lot of really great ones -  but I’m more interested in the cosplayers than their costumes. The BNW helps remove some of the punchiness or baseline “oddity” of the costumes, and lets me (maybe y’all) jump past the costumes and look closer at the people.

I dunno, I’m not wild about most of my results to be honest - like I think the photos are honest, and show the subjects in a favorable light (most important thing to me), but a lot of them fall short of being truly successful portraits that transcend the subject matter.

SOCIAL:

“pseudo” candid shot - would like more of these.

“pseudo” candid shot - would like more of these.

First and foremost, I’d like to thank everyone for being so accepting of me going and photographing them, alongside the convention for allowing me to do so - thanks again to Julie specifically, for approving my request. I really appreciate that everyone - or close to it -- I think out of whatever 150-160 people I photographed I only got turned down five odd times. 

The only real stipulation of me being allowed to photograph the con was that I had to ask everyone for permission first - which led to some mixed results - I definitely would’ve like to have gotten more candid photos - though as someone later pointed out to me, I could likely have asked permission, come back later, and made a sort of “pseudo-candid” photo.

I wish I’d done more rapport with folks -- I’m sure the base level awkwardness of a random outsider with a camera doesn’t help, but I found that a lot of the interactions photographing people went down as follows:

ME: “Can I take your photo?”

COSPLAYER/VENDOR/CONGOER: “Sure!”

I take the photo, maybe a second one. 

ME: “Thanks so much ---”

COSPLAYER: walks away.

I guess my talk-no-jutsu was too weak.

Occasionally, I’d try to follow up with a question, but I often found that most folks were on their way to something - I really would’ve liked to have gotten more “man on the street” data, or personal stories -- maybe next year. 

Back in 2007, Portcon was sort of the state fair for weebs and nerds, I don’t think that’s changed much since then - though I think on the whole, it’s become (maybe it was this in 2007?) a sort of first foray into a more public queer life for a lot of the teens in attendance. I’d also wager that the overall attendance actually skewed more female, or female and non-binary, than male.

Baseball folks

Baseball folks

HP5PC192.jpg

In almost perfect diametrical opposition, a baseball tournament was also being held nearby this year, and a lot of the teams were staying in the same hotel  as the convention. I photographed a few folks from that for contrast. I found that the adults were frequently game to be photographed and bore little malice towards the conventioneers - likewise with the middle-schoolers. But the highschoolers, the older ones - needed a serious attitude adjustment.

Anime has definitely changed a lot in the last 15 odd years -- My Hero Academia was by far the most commonly cosplayed series (though, that should surprise absolutely nobody), and outside of a few boomer anime costumes - like the woman cosplaying Misato, or a few Pokemon folks - I had trouble recognizing much of anything or anyone.

I don’t know if it was just covid that slowed the convention down - I found that it was fairly limited -- all the panels moved online, again, sensible given you’d have like 20-30-40 people in a conference room before -- and the main attraction was a couple of vendor rooms, along with a substantial cosplay pavilion - though even that shut down at 7pm -- all that being said, it didn’t keep the attendees down, they definitely seemed glad to be there. 

So, that’s what I learned and saw photographing PortCon 2021. Again, Thanks to the con, and everyone who let me take their photograph -- with a little luck, I’ll be back at it again next summer.


Tip us

Boston, LA, Back to Maine - Agfapan APX 400 - Late 2019, Early 2020

Boston, LA, New Orleans, Back to Maine - Agfapan APX 400 - Early 2020

There’s nothing quite like exploring a (relatively) unfamiliar city.

Boston should be more familiar to me -- I grew up two hours away from it. For about six months I’d go down every saturday to an extracurricular at MIT, then do Boston School of Rock. A couple years later I spent three weeks learning to make a guitar there — It’s a shit guitar. I mean I love it but it’s kinda shit. At any rate I stopped through the city on my way back to LA this year I think I did last year? Maybe it was two years ago. I can’t remember -- admittedly my brain/sense of time has kinda gone to shit (NB: I wrote this bit pre-covid -- my sense of time’s just gotten worse since then).

I got to the city fairly early on the Tuesday to basically just wander and shoot while I waited for a friend - the same friend who I visited last time I stopped through Boston - Shout out Andy - hopefully we’ll get to go do beers again soon.

At this point I’m working on my eventual giant stupid lab report or “what I learned shooting” on Agfapan APX 400 (original, german made, not the Harman/Kentmere stuff) -- I developed all of this in their/all the fucking stupid old mens’ forum’s favorite for it - Rodinal Spezial, which I will refer to as “spezial” from here on out to avoid confusion with Rodinal (which I also tried). They’re actually very different developers - the branding/naming is wildly unhelpful. I’m not enamoured of it, even though it has like a six minute development time at 20ºC. If you bother to read the safety sheet, it looks pretty similar to the modern Rollei RPX developer (which kinda tracks when theoretically RPX is the modern successor to APX), and HC-110 which I’ve never seen straight prints/scans from that I’ve particularly liked - setting aside Brendon Holt’s work on film -- also I’ve come round a bit more - HC-110 does also tend to look really good with kodak 400tx/Kodak Tri-x.

I pushed everything to 800 for safety. It’s alright? Like overall it’s okay and the photos are still solid but I’ve gone on to shoot more of the film and process in xtol 1:1 -- and frankly - it’s preferable by a long shot - the film bows way less than it normally does in the Spezial, less grainy, has a sharper edge to it - likewise if or when I run the film in standard Rodinal I’d expect quite a bit of grain - (it’s an old tech film) - but general sharper or edgier results (look for that further down).

Anyway, I decided to run all around Boston, Boston proper mind you -- for those unfamiliar with the area, the “city” of Boston is really made up of like 100 (exaggerating) smaller cities. I basically made a giant loop through the north end, and met up with Andy at the end of the day near Boston College. There wasn’t much light at that point so I don’t have too many photos from there on.

As much as Boston is an Old Colonial city, I honestly find that I tend towards shooting the skyscrapers and the brutalist public structures that crowd the main business district. I definitely shot less than I thought I would on this trip/visit, even given a whole day - in fairness I’ve gotten a lot choosier about the shots that I take.

Also in the spirit of changing stuff up, I tried to employ a looser/faster shooting style and more hipshooting to continue to push my previsualization skills -- also to try and feel out what shooting more like Moriyama feels like. I think I got mixed results. It felt okay at first, and there’s a bunch of stuff I do like, but I’m not 100% how I feel about the whole thing -- I think if I’d picked a developer or a contrast ratio that was a bit punchier and gave the photos a harder edge that might’ve helped some. Food for thought.

In other notes this is still a fairly early outing for me with the Minolta Rokkor-x w 35mm f/1.8 - though still equipped to the ever-constant Minolta XD-11. Some of the compositions are a little awkward, I’m still kind of wrapping my brain around the lens - I haven’t or hadn’t really gotten it under my fingers or in my brain all the way, but overall the look or angle of view has grown a lot on me. That said, I think I’d prefer the 1.4 of my 50mm than the 1.8 of the 35mm - I know that’s like ⅓ stop distinction but when it gets dark that ⅓ seems to make a world of difference - or like you’d be shocked at that difference.

I shot the film at 1600 and 3200. Not much better — take a look above and below for examples.

I’ve later come around and decided to merge this with my review overall of APX 400, and my return to maine photoblog - because it hasn’t really been all that long, and it’d be a really short post otherwise.

I think if I learned anything shooting the APX it’s that some film is just straight up dogshit awful - like theoretically there are good photos but like whatever. I feel like it’s worth noting that even the kenmere/harman (Agfaphoto APX 400) version of the emulsion is also terrible - and wildly expensive.

I basically packed all my shit up in about a week before lockdowns went into full/heavy effect in LA and then fucked off home back to Maine because, believe it or not, before covid, I was actually pretty tired of LA - no disrespect to anyone currently living there or from there - I just couldn’t hack it there anymore for my own personal reasons - it’s nobody’s fault but my own. I’ve wrapped up a few projects - which may or may not see the light of day.

Pretty quick after getting back to maine (and quarantining indoors for two weeks) - I scored up a camera kit containing a Minolta Rokkor MC-II 58mm f 1.2 (and some other bits) - to sell - which had some issues, but overall has performed fine - but I used that along with some of the APX 400 to finish testing it - I’m still definitely going to be selling it - I still prefer the MC PG Rokkor 50mm f/1.4 - for a 50ish lens length if for no other reason than familiarity, and that I personally believe my copy is magic - even though I seem to have really switched to 35mm in a big way. 

The final variable is that the last three rolls I did of APX 400 were in Renatto Repetto’s Coldinal Method - stand at 2hrs 1:50 +/- 40ºF --- and quite frankly that’s probably the best in terms of tonality that the film does. That said, it’s a medium/high speed film, in rodinal, and that just ruins any kind of reproducibility at any size bigger than 3x5 or 5x7 if you’re being really generous. And I’m not usually a stickler for technical capability in film - though I did love acros (original acros, not acros II - It doesn’t look the same no matter what anyone tells me - the tonal scale is distinctly different), when it was still alive and available. Honestly, there’s nothing I do with the original agfapan apx 400 that isn’t basically garbage - Will Hopkins (who’s got a travelogue in the works for us) seems to have had great results - so I dunno, but personally, between the flat and strange (strange bad) tonality, and the fucking miserable bowing that the film does, making it flat out soulcrushing to scan, I will never buy another roll of it to shoot myself, even if I can get it for cheap. Actually, if I were going to shoot another “budget” option it’d probably be a fomapan. They look nice, and dry flat - which makes it a clear pick if you want to buy a lot of film cheap - and you employ a scanning/hybrid method.

APXSpezial20200415_0661.jpg

Anyway. Thanks for giving this a read - really the words (and gear talk) is just here to push my seo ranking, so thanks, and sorry for any bloviation. If you like the content, subscribe to our patreon, throw me a donation, or pick up a zine - if you subscribe or donate all the funds go towards hosting content, rather than help me recoup from projects. 

Donate

Houston, Texas (Going Places) - September 2018

Houston, Texas (Going Places) - September 2018 

This was actually meant to be a print zine, or like a printed photo essay, under the name “Going Places.” 

It was very much about my relationship at the time, and a lot of the anxiety around meeting my ex’s family, what does the future look like, etc. I dunno at a year in that stuff is important. I like way too many of the photos, and the project to shelve the thing in my hard drive, but I also feel weird committing it to print, so the blog here seems like a solid compromise.

I think it’s an important set of photos to share (for me), and maybe one of the bigger steps up in quality/skill level/polish for me. I’m not really inclined to say too much about the project or what I made of the environment or much else, but I’ve structured the groupings/blocks of images in the same order I would’ve had them in the zine.

If you’re really curious as to what the zine would’ve looked like, I can shoot you a PDF copy, you can find my contact over on the contact page.

The other thing to note is that this is the last batch of photos I willingly mixed film stocks on. From this point forward, if I used different film stocks on a project or trip it’s because I ran out midway through shooting and needed more/backup, etc. I like all the different films/looks here but really, honestly, I would’ve been better off with a more cohesive overall tone.

Notes for film community folks (that non-film shooters know is pretty unimportant): 

All the color film is Fuji Superia 800. I think the greens actually look really good here, and the speed/grain fits in nicely with setting, and was really useful. I shot it at box speed.I’m working on a review of Superia 800/1600 (NB: Natura 1600 is Superia 1600) and what the viable replacements in the current market are. Hopefully I’ll have that up next week.

The black and white is really where I got into the weeds/into trouble. First of all, alternating color and black and white is really not working for me these days -- like a year later -- it hasn’t been that long -- but I ended up mixing three types of black and white film, with acceptable, but not cohesive results. The imagery itself is fine, but because I waffled around too much the feeling drifts. I think this was one of the first big outings I had with Agfapan APX 100, left un-pushed in post -- which is actually probably the look I’d prefer for the thing. I think the next black and white I shot was one of my few remaining rolls of Acros in 35mm, but pushed to 400 because 1. You can push Acros to 400, and 2. It looks good pushed, and because of the amount of time I was spending in the car, having those extra two stops really helps, when you’re shooting up at 1/500 or 1/1000. I think I had the common sense to bring one roll of Bergger Pancro 400, I know I pushed it to something fast, either 800 or 1600, but I couldn’t tell you off hand. Despite being very different films on paper, the contrast of Pancro 400 when pushed hard matches well with Acros at base, and even more so, when pushed -- I have a hard time telling the difference between the images made from those two emulsions from relatively small images.

Camera details: 

Minolta XD-11 and Rokkor PG-MC 50mm f/1.4. This is where I started to really lean into the “One Camera, One Lens” philosophy, at least as far as travel photography is concerned. The second trip to the Huntington is what really finalized that for me

Thoughts on the location:

Texas is weird. Or as Yankee scum I find it weird. It’s probably actually pretty normal.

For more e-zines and regular zines, please pick up a print zine in the shop!

Going Places

Downtown Los Angeles -- 11/18//1/19

Los Angeles 11/18//1/19

My primary mode of image making (yeah, I know it’s cringy to put it that way, or I find it cringy) -- generating work? -- is to go walk around and look or hunt for for sights or landscapes to adequately express both my own feelings and thoughts, with the feeling of the place integrated into that. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t. I’d wager most of what I do ends up getting buried on my hard drive or dumped here -- not because it’s bad, but because I feel like it’s just better viewed as a large dump of images, and it’s not necessarily my “strongest” or most directly competitive work. But I still think a lot of it is neat, and I like to get into the habit of sharing stuff so it doesn’t completely rot away on my hard drive. Also notably most of that day-to-day practice is shot in and around Downtown Los Angeles, so this is maybe two of my more serious, more real sets or studies, on an area I shoot often.

Walk 1: I try and shoot the Bonaventure.

So here’s (I guess a re-do) of part of my Agfapan APX 100 review -- broken into two primary walks. The first walk was with the Minoltina AL-S (I mean another re-do review?) -- up into a part of downtown or the financial district I haven’t really explored too much before -- ideally to get a good shot of the Bonaventure -- but also to kind of explore the corporate parks that seem to crop up around the financial district. I know public space seems to be required for a lot of zoning laws here in Los Angeles, but I’m slowly slipping into the opinion that I’d rather have a real park be easily accessible via direct taxes on those buildings and have it well maintained than some weirdo corporate park that, unless you’re willing to hunt for it, nobody knows exists. Unless the corporate parks are private property that exist for no discernable reason aside from some kind of vanity.  It’s a strange phenomena, and I’ve only ever seen it in Los Angeles. Food for thought.

For the camera -- I dunno. I’ve inherited another couple “compact” rangefinders between last year and this one -- I’d wager it’s getting dangerously close to a year since I shot the first batch of photos -- the AL-s is really actually a nice rangefinder given that it’s compact, cheap etc. The frame-lines are pretty accurate (if there’s only one set of framelines is it frameline?) and on top of that the finder itself has breathing room around the lines, which to me, is the single biggest advantage to shoot rangefinder over SLR. There are other advantages, but being able to see what’s around your image while looking through the finder is a huge plus, and it made me second guess a lot of these photos way less than I would normally at that point in time.

The film itself -- on that first trip/walk I know shot at 100 I developed all the Agfa APX 100 in Rodinal 1:50 and pushed to somewhere between 160 and 240 via semi-stand development (agitate normally the first 3 minutes, then 1-2 gentle rotations every third minute) The look is pretty good, or like I like the baseline, but it’s grainer than I’d hoped it would be, or like I wish I’d gotten more grain masking -- though I wonder if that only comes into play via true stand development. Either way, I was happy or proud enough to go see an area near my house (apartment) I rarely if ever actually go explore or see. In it of itself there’s no strong feeling or thought here, but it’s interesting enough to warrant posting up.

Walk 2: the one where I get a cold, but it’s worth it because it never rains here, and I get to capture Downtown Los Angeles in exactly as depressing and cold a manner as it feels, figuratively.

Yeah basically read the title on that one. I dunno. I was saving this and the last one for the megabus I was going to called “bury me in LL Bean” but I’ve nixed that project. It’s super fucking narccistic to think I actually need or deserve a retrospective of the last five years (almost six?). I dunno, I’ve gotten significantly better but it’s not like I’m a big enough deal, even in my own mind these days, to warrant any kind of retrospective.

(APX 100 1:50 to the left, Tri-x 1600/3200 below)

So much belated, this is probably the last chapter of that five year period. Unimportant as it is. I’m sure I need to purge it somewhere. So why not here, on the home of Wasteland Books, which is simultaneously a zine and or idea graveyard for myself, and maybe a platform too. Have y’all bought anything? 

Anyway, I tried to keep a consistent profile across the walk, which, after my camera (I was running with the XD-11) got shorted out -- and started having extreme technical difficulties -- I was stuck shooting the built in mechanical shutter at 1/100 and crutched at f/4 -- which while not  particularly slow or particularly wide open, is still less control than I’d ideally like to have had. And the camera still went ersatz again towards the end. Notably I did throw in a roll of Kodak Tri-X pushed to 1600 or shot at 1600 and pushed to 3200 (either way in xtol 1:1) in the mix, along with a roll of Kodak T-max 100, developed in rodinal 1:100, in my then totally crippled camera at the very end, because I’d finally burnt the XD-11 to the ground.  (Agfapan APX 100 1:50 Below)

You’d think the repair techs at my local camera shop would be happier to see me back as often as I was during that period. Mostly they seemed annoyed Which I guess is also fair -- the XD-11, according to them at least, is pretty miserable to fix. 

Again, I encountered more corporate parks on that walk. Or I guess because it’s attached to government buildings, government corporate parks. Just badly designed civic features. Most of my focus was on banal tired construction and the undercurrent streets between downtown and chinatown. This was also before I figured out canned air was a thing, and at this point I can’t really be bothered to re-scan everything, as this is now non-essential or competitive work.

So that’s downtown in the rain, or around the rain. A bunch of good photos, and photos that’d probably otherwise be clipped out. It’s basically just a way for me to show work in progress.

Overall, I like my results, give or take some fallibility. I also prefer the look of one developer/film combo, one lens, etc, over shooting a smorgasbord all at once, but it’s okay here. I do really love the inky black you can pull out of Agfapan APX 100. 

If you like this content or even just want to support me please buy something in the shop. 

(T-max 100 below)

What I learned shooting... #4: Agfapan APX100 (35mm)

A thorough review and overview of one of the last batch of Agfapan APX100 in 35mm. Tested primarily with the Minolta XD-11, and Rokkor MC-PG 50mm 1.4 lens, and to a lesser extent the Minoltina AL-s. Primary Developers used were Kodak Xtol, and Rodinal.

Read More

What I Learned Shooting... #3: Minolta XD-11 -- A Tribute

I’m gonna switch topics from film to cameras and lenses here for the next couple weeks while I wrap up my 2 100ft rolls of Agfapan APX 100. (I’m at #17/36 as of posting this)

I have pretty much all the gear I could want or reasonably need. I have a full shooting set of lenses (and a few extras) in Minolta SR (the actual name of the mount, not MC/MD -- so help me god if I hear one more person call it that...), and in Pentax 6x7 for medium format.

Over the last five years I’ve shot a Minolta XD-series (XD, 11, and 7) camera with near slavish devotion. I’ll test out a new camera now and again --mainly an SRT 102 (seriously underrated), and the Minoltina Al-s (also critically underrated).

I may switch to a compact rangefinder (say a CLE with Rokkor 40/2) now that I tote a Pentax 6x7 around for most of my “serious” work, and use 35mm as a bts/quick journal camera, but I’ll never get rid of my workhorse(s). Also if I end up doing more portraiture or editorial work, and it wasn’t on Medium Format, I’d happily shoot it on my XD.

Let me put a few things out there right now:

  1. I love these cameras so much, when I had all four break on me, I nearly got their serial numbers tattooed onto my ribs (I didn’t -- a friend pointed out that that was kinda Holocaust-ey, and maybe I should avoid that -- thanks Jake.)

  2. I’ve always been a “Minolta guy,” my first camera, at age 15 was an XG-M, the repair guys at my local repair shop Walter’s Camera Repair -- http://www.walterscamerarepairs.com/ -- Call me “the minolta guy.” (not a paid endorsement, seriously, if you’re in LA and need honest repairs done at a fair price and pretty quickly, they can probably help you out.)

  3. Either by gross overfamiliarity or closemindedness, I really don’t like most of the other 35mm camera brands’ SLR’s from the pre-autofocus era. I hate the Canon AE-1, I think it’s a bad camera with a backwards meter, honestly Canon SLR’s on the whole before AF are just straight garbage. Most of the Nikons are nice but badly designed, clunky, or flat out backwards -- good lenses though. I guess Pentax is okay (for 35mm -- Medium Format is a whole different story). I don’t know shit about Olympus -- people who shoot them seem to really like them.

  4. I think most reviews of this camera kinda miss the point of it. Or at least haven’t run  give or take 400 rolls through the the thing. It’s always “Leica this, Minolta that.”

  5. My complaints on reliability are a little bullshit. I probably ran +/- 75 rolls through the damn thing this year. I don’t think most people run that much through their cameras or tend to flat out abuse or over-carry their equipment the way I tend to. I’ll probably keep stricter track next year.

After nearly a page of disclosures and complaints here we go:

Here’s why I love this camera:

  1. It feels really nice in the hand. -- It’s a relatively compact design, but all metal, and it’s weighted really evenly with the 50 1.4 MC, which is the lens I use most as of writing this. I realize this is probably a dumb thing to vaunt as it’s best feature, but it makes it much more enjoyable to use regularly.

  2. It has a quasi-mechanical vertical shutter. While it lacks a really fast sync speed -- like a Contax g2 or a leaf shutter camera -- it can do 1/100th of a second, mechanically. I can shoot any lens I regularly use with it, safely, and mechanically if I have a battery failure. Also 1/100th of a second is fast enough for *most* uses. I know HSS is a hot commodity, but 1/100th is usably fast for me. Also, for an SLR, assuming you get a good copy of the camera, it’s really quiet.

  3. It has three modes in order of usefulness, Manual, Aperture Priority, and Shutter Priority. It’s not easy to accidentally switch between the modes, and they’re all pretty reliable --- the camera actually has a hidden program mode which double-checks your exposure and fixes it -- steplessly.

  4. The meter is good down to EV 1 -- Which basically has you covered in most situations you’ll ever run into, unless you’re a hardcore night photographer, or shoot mostly backlit.

  5. Kind of a no-brainer, which is why it’s #5 on my list, but Rokkor lenses.

Complaints:

  1. It’s a hard camera to fix. My normal shop can do a bunch of fixes on it, but they can’t fix everything -- apparently the circuit board is kinda janky, or not an easy one to fix because of how early-primitive it is in its technology.

  2. It’s not nearly as reliable as a standard mechanical camera. I put way too many rolls through my camera, but I still probably have to send it out once a year for maintenance.

  3. People have started to get in on the camera, and the price of them keeps climbing. Also the number of Black Minolta XD’s keeps shrinking. And if you’ve seen the black finish, you know how great it is. The silver is fine, but the black finish is just better.

What’ve I learned shooting it?

A lot.

I’ve had one (of four) basically since I showed up in Los Angeles five years ago.

Basically, with the XD-11, I’ve used it to shoot everything: friends, the city, my drive across America, my first fashion editorial --- which I’m pretty sure never got released --- and every project I’ve done in 35mm. If you look at my instagram or any 35mm feature or story on here, it was most likely shot on the XD11.

It also showed me what I like and dislike in a camera, and it’s now what I bench my expectations around.

Anyway -- Thanks for reading! If you’ve enjoyed this -- please consider buying a zine in the shop. It helps me keep the lights on here.

Feature #5: Mourning (Homecoming)

Feature #5: Mourning (Homecoming)

A trip home to Maine under the most dire of circumstances.

Two days of shooting, and three completely separate contexts: Eastern Prom of Portland, Maine, the Royal River, and a bridge over it, in Falmouth, Maine. A hiking path to Morse Mountain, and then Popham Beach State Park in Popham, Maine. Three different landscapes, and three different experiences.

Shot on a mixture of Portra 160, 400, on medium format film on a Pentax 6x7.

Read More

Your Phone is All the Point-and-Shoot You Need.

Shooting or taking pictures daily, or very frequently, is an essential habit for photographers of all stripes. Many of us who shoot film carry a dedicated film camera on us all the time, in addition to the camera that every living person carries: their cellphone. I believe that your phone camera is an equally useful, or better, point-and-shoot than any other stand-alone point-and-shoot camera (a compact film or digital program camera) for most uses, and that buying a true point-and-shoot is pointless.

Most point and shoot cameras were aimed at the average person who wanted to shoot photos wherever without having to worry too much, and take their camera with them easily. Likewise the premium point and shoots were supposed to enable pro photographers on the go to shoot a nice camera anywhere without having to lug their normal gear. The iPhone destroyed the camera market, and digital point and shoot sales aimed at the average person have largely been completely cannibalized by cellphone camera market.

On the premium end of the spectrum we have the Contaxes, Fuji’s, and Olympus Mju’s on the film side, and the Rx1 and assorted fixed lens Leicas/Panasonics. I could definitely understand if you didn’t want to take your studio camera, you’d take a lighter smaller camera with you for day-to-day shooting. Most film shooters, take their “premium” point-and-shoots with them in addition to some other interchangeable lens camera. Unless you’re lugging a medium format camera, or something else equivalently heavy, it all seems a bit redundant.

Realistically, how many of us regularly shoot or share for print? Even if one did print regularly how often would you really want to print a 35mm negative bigger than 11x14, (about 12 megapixels)? I know that 99% of what I shoot day-to-day on 35mm, goes to a 5.5-6” screen, max. I can’t imagine being far from the norm here. If one absolutely needs grain or a particular film look, you can fix that in 30 seconds or less, in VSCO.

The main argument, that I would accept is that: you know what focal length you want, the point and shoot camera provides a look and feel, that’s satisfactory to you, and it’s part of your artistic goals or statement, or you find that shooting a dedicated camera gives better results than taking your time with a phone, more power to you. But for those of you that use that camera in addition to a Leica or a Contax g2, or basically any 35mm SLR, why? It seems like pure collectorism, especially with the insane (and still rising) prices, and the diminishing or flat out non-existent ability to repair these cameras.

My phone is one of my favorite cameras. It does exactly what I need it to, which is take pictures that I don’t have to think too much about, or offhand as a reminder to go back and shoot something, or when I can’t be bothered to take a regular camera with me, which I’d argue is the whole point of a premium point and shoot, it’s supposed to be simple and quick for social use, which is exactly what modern technology has provided with in-phone cameras, and software.